然而幾個(gè)小時(shí)后，路透社修改了這條稿件。引發(fā)熱議的“封殺阿里巴巴”竟是一條徹頭徹尾的假新聞，是外媒在一廂情愿“挑事”。

經(jīng)查證，特朗普并未在發(fā)布會(huì)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)提及“封殺阿里巴巴”。現(xiàn)場(chǎng)對(duì)話實(shí)錄如下——

彭博社記者：“總統(tǒng)先生，您已經(jīng)對(duì)TikTok和微信采取了行動(dòng)。 您還想禁止其他哪些中國(guó)科技公司在美國(guó)運(yùn)營(yíng)？”

特朗普：“嗯，最重要的是華為。 華為不在這里，華為我不允許。 我已經(jīng)告訴歐洲國(guó)家和其他國(guó)家。以澳大利亞為例。但是華為不會(huì)來(lái)這里。我們告訴了某些國(guó)家和地區(qū)我們對(duì)華為的看法，可以使用它們，但是我們不會(huì)共享情報(bào)，他們都放棄了。你看英國(guó)，看起來(lái)他們一直在走，現(xiàn)在他們退出了。”

彭博社記者：“有沒(méi)有特定的公司？”

特朗普：“我們?cè)诳雌渌虑椤?我想我們是的。”

彭博社記者：“阿里巴巴？”

從現(xiàn)場(chǎng)視頻來(lái)看，特朗普似乎沒(méi)有聽(tīng)到記者最后補(bǔ)充的“阿里巴巴？”，發(fā)布會(huì)繼續(xù)進(jìn)行下去了。

美國(guó)已在周五要求TikTok的母公司字節(jié)跳動(dòng)在90天內(nèi)剝離TikTok在美國(guó)的業(yè)務(wù)。美國(guó)接下來(lái)是否會(huì)對(duì)其他中國(guó)公司施加壓力，廣受關(guān)注。

但在剛剛這場(chǎng)發(fā)布會(huì)上，所謂“封殺”不但沒(méi)有得到證實(shí)，甚至不是個(gè)正式的問(wèn)題，難怪路透社這么快就修改了稿件內(nèi)容！

附：發(fā)布會(huì)問(wèn)答原文

- Bloomberg: “Mr. President, you’ve already taken action on TikTok and WeChat. Which other Chinese tech companies are you looking at banning from operating in the United States?”

- Trump: “Well, the big thing is Huawei, right? Huawei is not here, and Huawei I am not allowing. And I’ve told European countries and others. Australia has been fantastic as an example. But Huawei is not coming here. And we told certain countries what we think about Huawei, and it’s ok you can use them, but we are not gonna be sharing intelligence, and they’ve all backed away. You look at the UK; look like they were going that way, and now they backed out. Scotland Yard…”

- Bloomberg: “Are there any particular companies”

- Trump: “Well, we are looking at other things. Yes, we are. We are.”

- Bloomberg: “……Alibaba?”